On 4/1/19 5:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 1 16:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Apr 1 16:28, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >>> On 3/28/19 9:30 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> can you please collect the base addresses of all DLLs generated during >>>> the build, plus their size and make a sorted list? It would be >>>> interesting to know if the hash algorithm in ld is actually as bad >>>> as I conjecture. >>> >>> Please find attached the output of rebase -i for the dlls after bootstrap >>> on Cygwin 3.0.4, each built with ld from binutils-2.31.1. > > Oh, wait. That's not what I was looking for. The addresses are ok, but > the paths *must* be the ones at the time the DLLs have been created, > because that's what ld uses when creating the image base addresses.
Maybe I can provide that one as well. > The > addresses combined with the installation paths don't make sense anymore. > > Apart from that, since you seem to be installing the DLLs anyway, can't > you combine every crucial point during installation with a rebase? This is what I'm after now, but I may need to introduce something like additional readonly databases plus some --unregister option to rebase. /haubi/