Hi Michael,

On Jul 30 17:22, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Hi,
> following up https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2019-q2/msg00155.html
> It turns out that fixup_shms_after_fork does require the child pinfo to
> be "remember"ed, while the fork retry to be silent on failure requires
> the child to not be "attach"ed yet.
> As current pinfo.remember performs both "remember" and "attach" at once,
> the first patch does introduce pinfo.remember_without_attach, to not
> change current behaviour of pinfo.remember and keep patches small.
> However, my first thought was to clean up pinfo API a little and have
> remember not do both "remember+attach" at once, but introduce some new
> remember_and_attach method instead.  But then, when 'bool detach' is
> true, the "_and_attach" does feel wrong.

I'd prefer to drop the reattach call from remember, calling both of them
where appropriate.


Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to