Brian Inglis writes: >> It would be easier to review if you would split it up into smaller patches, >> each >> doing one thing, to the extent that this makes sense. For example, the >> simplification achieved by using the ftcprint macro could be done in a >> single >> patch that's separate from the substantive changes. > > Unfortunately, that was added later to make the got it/add it/skip it flag > cross > checks in Linux order more certain vs my own sequential tabular source.
I usually use Emacs/magit to split up a bunch of changes into a more comprehensible series of commits post factum, but there are other ways to achieve that same goal. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables