On Jun 25 22:11, John Haugabook wrote:
> Hi Corinna and Achim,
> 
> > This shouldn't be necessary.  On Fedora the ParserDetails.ini file is
> > part of the perl-XML-SAX package but apparently it isn't in the
> > Cygwin package.  Is there a reason for that?  The user shouldn't
> > have to create the file manually...
> 
> Two things:
> 1. The error appears on both builds, but is slightly different in the
> cygwin install
> 2. Sorry, but out of ignorance I didn't mention that the error was
> from the "src" install
> (hoping this makes for good new user feedback regarding build section).
> 
> The error output (with context before and after) from the cygwin install was:
> """""""""""""""
> make[3]: Entering directory
> '/oss/src/newlib-cygwin/build/x86_64-pc-cygwin/winsup/doc'
>   GEN      Makefile.dep
>   GEN      cygwin-ug-net/cygwin-ug-net.pdf
>   GEN      cygwin-api/cygwin-api.pdf
>   GEN      cygwin-api/cygwin-api.html
>   GEN      cygwin-ug-net/cygwin-ug-net.html
>   GEN      faq/faq.html
> Element listitem in namespace '' encountered in answer, but no template 
> matches.
>   GEN      faq/faq.body
>   GEN      cygwin-ug-net/cygwin-ug-net-nochunks.html.gz
>   GEN      api2man.stamp
>   GEN      intro2man.stamp
>   GEN      utils2man.stamp
>   GEN      charmap
>   GEN      cygwin-api.info
> #HERE
> could not find ParserDetails.ini in /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/5.40/XML/SAX
> warning : xmlAddEntity: invalid redeclaration of predefined entity 'lt'
>   GEN      cygwin-ug-net.info
> # HERE
> could not find ParserDetails.ini in /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/5.40/XML/SAX
> warning : xmlAddEntity: invalid redeclaration of predefined entity 'lt'
> docbook2texi://refentry[@id='proc']/refnamediv: section is too deep
> docbook2texi://refsect1[@id='proc-desc']: section is too deep
> # ect....
> """""""""""""""
> The remaining install did not end with an error code (2 usually)
> though, and completed successfully.

So do I understand you right that the manual ParserDetails.ini
generation isn't really required for the doc build to run through?

If so, we shouldn't really care to document it as a requirement.


Corinna

Reply via email to