> I pushed patches 1, 2, and 4. I'm not sure about patch 3. I don't > think it's necessary for people who are willing to build Cygwin itself. > To the contrary, I think it's rather puzzeling in a FAQ about building > Cygwin to talk about a two-step installation, which is only preliminary > for the actual Cygwin build process.
Sounds good. I'll mark this off my to-do list, and get started on redoing an earlier patch "[PATCH 4/4] faq.html: add 3.4 run cloned site locally", making it a patchset on reproducing the website locally from the cygwin-htdocs repo. Thanks for the feedback, and reviewing. Take Care, John Haugabook
