----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>I bet it would improve even more if we replaced the VirtualQuery > >>in path.cc, too. > > > >With Rob's new patch that does this, > >there actually isn't very much difference > > > >real 7m10.729s > >user 2m50.963s > >sys 1m11.721s > > > >Thanks ! > > Huh. I wonder why it makes such a big difference for pthreads. > Volume of calls :}. openening files doesn't occur quite as often as (say) locking a mutex. I'd like to publicly thank Greg Smith for his excellent profiling work in identifying the bottleneck here. I know how time consuming that can be :}. Thanks Greg! Rob
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Jason Tishler
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Jason Tishler
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Jason Tishler
- RE: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Norman Vine
- RE: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Norman Vine
- RE: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Norman Vine
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Christopher Faylor
- RE: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Norman Vine
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and p... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and p... Robert Collins
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Jason Tishler
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and p... Jason Tishler
- Re: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Jason Tishler
- FW: Deadly embrace between pthread_cond_wait and pthrea... Norman Vine
