Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > >I'm not wild about using something called NONAMELESSUNION to control > >whether a nameless *structure* is defined but I guess it's ok. > > Never the less, the MSDN will have the control on how this is implemented if it applies in this case. Or is NONAMELESSUNION something we've made up along the way? Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Danny Smith
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Christopher Faylor
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT (again) Christopher Faylor
