On 5/22/2012 9:34 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2012-05-22 01:25, marco atzeri wrote: >> question on cygport: >> I am playing with openmpi but for the time being, I am not yet able to >> built the dynamic modules due to interdepencies. > > Interdependent libraries? Just lovely. :-( There are ways to work > around that, but it'll be a pain. > >> How I can bypass this during installation: >> >> Fixing libtool modules: >> usr/lib/openmpi/libompi_dbg_msgq.la >> *** ERROR: libompi_dbg_msgq.la dynamic module was not built > > You can't, and for good reason: static modules are completely worthless, > so if one shows up, it is a red flag that something is certainly wrong. > > You're going to have to fix these libraries to build regardless of > interdependencies. Let me know if I can be of assistance in that regard. > > > Yaakov > Cygwin Ports >
In this case they are static as I built as static. It is a bit annoying that cygport disagree with my intention. PS: not all the libraries are dynamic upstream. Suitesparse is still static and it works fine for building octave. Qhull was static for long term before upstream released a dynamic version with some hints from my side. Lapack and Atlas are still static upstream, and the dynamic cygwin libraries are results of some hacks. Regards Marco ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Cygwin-ports-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cygwin-ports-general
