RE: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are they called?)

[Robert Collins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM

> I don't see any reason to delay adopting XFree86 into the 
> main setup. So, lets not worry about customizing anything or 
> offering alternate setup.ini's.

I don't see any reason either, but then I've been pushing for this for
>6 months.

The reason I'm suggesting have a test setup.ini is so that their
install-script can be tested a little bit...

Rob