> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:19 PM > I don't think it's that big a deal to require cygwin packages > to follow > a parseable naming scheme; ours is pretty lenient...when it > fails, it's > not a terrible imposition to either change a '-' to a '_', or > swap some > digits and alphabetics within a -XXXX- word. And package file names are not directly used by humans 99% of the time. That's what setup + cygcheck + upset are for. Rob
- Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal... Ian Burrell
- Re: info: single install xfree86 + min... Charles Wilson
- Re: info: single install xfree86 + min... Christopher Faylor
- Re: info: single install xfree86 ... Ian Burrell
- Re: info: single install xfre... Christopher Faylor
- Re: info: single install xfre... Christopher Faylor
- Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal... Christopher Faylor
- RE: info: single install xfree86 + min... Harold Hunt
- Re: info: single install xfree86 ... Christopher Faylor
- RE: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin? Robert Collins
- RE: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin? Robert Collins
- RE: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin? Tim Huckvale
- Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin? Jim George
- RE: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cyg... Tim Huckvale
