> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms > Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 10:29 AM > Chuck, > > For crying out loud, 95% of the installers out there create > shortcuts for > the user in the startmenu and on the desktop. Why is this such a bad > thing for setup.exe to do? What does external data have to > do with the > price of potatos? Seriously, I'm proposing a "simple" > solution which is > the norm for most installers. Where have I gone astray? Because simple solutions often increase coupling, wheres a more thought out solution decreases coupling. Also, I know you are subscribed to cygwin-apps, and I just posted there just a couple of days ago about wanting to remove the hardcoded stuff from setup.exe. Rob
- RE: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Robert Collins
- RE: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Nicholas Wourms
- RE: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Robert Collins
- RE: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Nicholas Wourms
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Jehan
- RE: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Robert Collins
- RE: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Nicholas Wourms
- RE: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Robert Collins
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Charles Wilson
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Nicholas Wourms
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Robert Collins
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Jehan
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Nicholas Wourms
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Jehan
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Nicholas Wourms
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Jehan
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after i... Nicholas Wourms
- Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after installing with setup.exe i... Nicholas Wourms
