> I agree, we should hook user32.dll. > I have some code that does the following: > 1) Uses Windows Hooks (designed for Computer-Based Training > etc) to get > loaded > into program as soon as the program creates a window, then calls 2) > 2) Updates the address table to redirect certain functions > from desired dlls > Basically we want to replace 1) with a program that loads the program > and then does 2) > This would then be "wrapX11" > This way we don't have to rename user32.dll to user32-real.dll and > replace it with our own, > we just add user32-X11.dll in and make it replace certain functions.
Sounds better. * Would not require a reboot to install / test * Is less likely to break when a service pack upgrades user32.dll
