For the record, I checked my copy. It didn't have any mention of -rootless. That doesn't mean that someone has or hasnt thought to add such a section to it. Instead of flogging an obvious novice (lars) who couldn't find the option, which is partially understandable as it wasn't documented, I thought perhaps that reflection on the current-ness of the packaged documentation would be more productive and positive than vented impatience.
Granted, as Russell pointed out to me, it is preferred that people search the archives before pestering the discussion list, and I agree with that philosophy in theory and practice, but not everyone gets it. (Including my boss.) On the other hand, it seems one could argue that we would never need man pages in the Internet age, as everyone who needs to know how to use something can just search through the archives of the mailing list dedicated to that program. I'm not sure that's the best method of disseminating documentation, though. As for me, I'll be sure to be more specific in the future. Regards, Kdt Christopher Faylor was recently quoted as saying... > > I'm not sure what you are pleading for but I don't see why asking people > to contribute is a terrible thing on any list. And, pointing out that > it is ludicrous to ask hundreds of people (i.e., the people on this > mailing list) to check on something like "Is it in the man page yet" > when one could easily check this on their on system is not something > that even a (shudder) "newbie" should have problems with.
