J S wrote: > Sorry I didn't realise what ls_netdev was before. I will try it tomorrow > when I go back to work.
Maybe this will bring some light to the problem.
> Anything suspicious there?
Only that the dll reports more accourate values than ls_netdev *g*
bye
ago
NP: Blutengel - Wonderland
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
