At 15:50 2003-03-31, you wrote:
KH,
The scope is probably beyond the scope of this mailing list.
I think you would be better off working first on a version of Cygwin/XFree86 that compiled without Cygwin... then, and only then, could you even begin to worry about wrapping XFree86 with a COM interface.
Cygwin /XFree86 without Cygwin is Win32/XFree86, or some such, is it not?
It always seemed to me that the target specifier ought to come after the main program name: XFree86/Cygwin, XFree86/Win32, etc.
Harold
Randall Schulz
