On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 05:22:10PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:58:23AM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Just >>so it's clear: I don't care to get involved in fixing issues where the >>bug report is "something is horribly wrong with it", either, so if you >>do actually want to work on fixing it, then I'll need more to go on >>than I have been given and I'll need some hint of cooperation rather >>than attitude. But, of course, that's a good lesson for life anyway. > >Just so it is clear: I wasn't asking for anyone to get involved.
"Getting involved" is what a package owner is supposed to do. Why do you get involved when someone says Cygwin/XFree86 is broken? No one is specifically asking you to get involved. >I saw your initial defensive remark to Earle saying that the new >version of flex wasn't working for him You have entirely misread my response. Earle made a confusing statement about what he did to rectify a problem. I replied, indicating that his stated version numbers made no sense if what he said was true. For the record, I upgraded flex because someone was complaining that it was older than the latest release. So I upgraded it for them. I ran the test suite prior to releasing it. Goodbye. cgf
