On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Harold L Hunt II wrote: > > I changed the condition when IncludeMakefile is defined as sinclude (the > > former condition seemed broken) and define HasMakefileSafeInclude in cygwin.cf
The second was already in CVS. So I only changed the condiation. > > Interesting. Do you have any idea as to why your commit message didn't > go through? I've seen the commit message. But i was hidden between same hundred commit messages from kaleb *g*. http://pdx.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg-commit/2004-February/000377.html Index: Imake.rules =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/xorg/xc/config/cf/Imake.rules,v retrieving revision 1.1.4.3 retrieving revision 1.1.4.3.2.1 diff -u -d -r1.1.4.3 -r1.1.4.3.2.1 --- a/Imake.rules 30 Nov 2003 16:46:49 -0000 1.1.4.3 +++ b/Imake.rules 23 Feb 2004 21:39:04 -0000 1.1.4.3.2.1 @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ * The double-@ is to ensure no leading spaces on the line. */ #ifndef IncludeMakefile -#if HasClearmake +#if HasClearmake || HasMakefileSafeInclude #define IncludeMakefile(file) @@sinclude file #else #if HasBsdMake ClearMake seems to be a commercial product and has (IMO) nothing to do with sinclude. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723 Chemnitzer Linux-Tag 2004 - 6. und 7. März 2004 http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag