On Mar 26 11:12, Harold L Hunt II wrote: > Yes, it seems inconsistent to me. > > Cygwin/X is different than a port of package foo to Cygwin: Cygwin/X is > an integral piece of Cygwin and runs *only* on Cygwin; it is much more > important than a port.
I've moved the link to the Cygwin/X page up to be the second link in the left menu bar. This way, Cygwin/X got a sufficiently prominent place in the menu and both pages have a more similar menu layout. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
