Hi, AFAICT there is no release announcement for 6.8.99.901-1, and there are several bug reports requiring manual intervention or downgrades. In fact I am experiencing lockups myself, and had to downgrade.
This being the case (no release announcement + egregious regressions), shouldn't 6.8.99.901-1 be marked as experimental, so people don't upgrade to it semi-automatically? James R. Phillips cygwin octave/ghostscript maintainer -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/
