-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Jon TURNEY wrote:
> Ah, and what do you think about the attached change to the .cygport file
> itself to propagate the distribution patchlevel into the version number?

I would prefer to use the BUILD_DATE define instead, since that is a
patch to the sources rather than YA hack in the .cygport file.  I'll
include a patch for testing for -5.


Yaakov
Cygwin/X
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkl0BI4ACgkQpiWmPGlmQSMyZgCgh9naS2HzlXF4uo2nhCEcZ3Va
2HgAn28czb6XJrhnfNjbFO+zk7P7N/Wl
=czA7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:                   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/

Reply via email to