On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:40:01PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: >On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, webmaster wrote: > >>> I just built 269 and will uploaded it with the rest of the X11 updates. >> It doesn't help. I built using cygport from what you've got in git and >> I still get: >> >> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61020497 >> eax=00DA80E0 ebx=6124298C ecx=76A10D06 edx=00371D48 esi=00000000 edi=0028F9F4 >> ebp=61020BE0 esp=0028C7C4 program=C:\Cygwin\bin\xterm.exe, pid 672, thread >> main >> cs=0023 ds=002B es=002B fs=0053 gs=002B ss=002B >> Stack trace: >> Frame Function Args >> End of stack trace >> >> Note that I often (almost always) get this written to >> xterm.exe.stackdump even when xterm opens successfully. Also note that >> opening xterms is *much* slower than on XP. > >:-( > >It would be nice to know whether the problem lies in xterm itself, or >the libraries. Is it possible to compile with the -g debug option, >run that from gdb, to get a walkback?
The EIP (61020497) above suggests a potential problem in Cygwin. Could we get some cygcheck output, as per http://cygwin.com/problems.html ? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/
