Rob
UNIXCONN includes sys/un.h headers, which TCPCONN uses only socket.h.
Do you think using sys/un.h and sys/socket.h, both, is necessary? Upto
Cygwin 1.1.2 I was using only TCPCONN and I did not notice any difference.
I would activate it once again if needed. For now I want to see if
It helps those users who are having "accept () failed" errors on Windows
95/98.
Suhaib
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 9:03 PM
> To: Suhaib Siddiqi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated binaries for Xfree86 4.1.0
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Suhaib Siddiqi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 11:00 AM
> Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated binaries for Xfree86 4.1.0
>
>
> >
> > I have updated the binary release of Cygwin/XFree86.
> > Following problems are fixed:
> >
> > 1) Fixed XFree86-MISC extension. Some clients, e.g. xgc were crashing
> due
> > to missing Xfree86-MISC extension.
> > 2) Symbols export issues with DLls.
> > 3) X uses only TCPCONN, instead of TCPCONN and UNIXCONN.
>
> Do you mind if I ask wht UNIXCONN has been disabled?
>
> Rob
