On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:55:26PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 15:00, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Ah. I was wondering why errors weren't bein displayed already. Now I >>understand the distinction. >> >>If we added a "--warn-bad-auto-export" as an ld option for building >>DLLs, could we flag errors that way? Would it give false negatives if >>we warned about multi-word exports? > >Thats what I read into Chuck's "anything based on the base address of >the next export is bound to be flakey".
I read that as saying that it wasn't bad for a "normal" export but it was fatal when used with auto-import. So, you wouldn't want to issue a warning unless you were interested in using the DLL as an auto-import DLL. Or do I have it backwards? cgf
