Eliot Moss <moss <at> cs.umass.edu> writes: > - But part of rebasing is to use ash (since it does not tie down > so many dlls and all, I believe) ... but ash is not there!
Then something went wrong with your installation, because the dash package installs /usr/bin/ash.exe as part of the Base install, alongside /usr/bin/dash.exe. > - After a while, I found "dash", which appears to be "ash" under > a different name. I found the change gratuitous and surprising. > Users will need to be warned, I think, or the name changed back. There's no need for a name change, but it _would_ be nice to know what failed during your installation. > Hope there's something useful to you here ... Eliot Moss What would have been more useful would be following the directions and attaching cygcheck -svr output, as mentioned here: > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -- Eric Blake volunteer dash maintainer -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
