On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:14:11AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Nov 16 09:01, Dave Korn wrote: >>> aputerguy wrote: >>> >>>> So is 'subinacl' just another example of these badly behaved non-Cygwin >>>> applications? >>> Looks like it. >>> >>>> If so, is there anything one can do other than to use one of the other >>>> methods to get a properly authenticated ssh login? >>> You mean, apart from the other methods to get a properly authenticated ssh >>> login, is there a method to get a properly authenticated ssh login? No, >>> there >>> is no method to get a properly authenticated ssh login, apart from the >>> methods >>> to get a properly authenticated ssh login. If you want a method to get a >>> properly authenticated ssh login, I'm afraid you're completely stuck; you'll >>> just have to use one of the methods to get an authenticated ssh login. >> >> Sounds tricky... > > Yep. It might be easier to just use one of the methods to get an >authenticated ssh login instead.
Is that even possible though? cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
