On Jan 15 11:07, Vincent R. wrote: > >>> > >>> On 14/01/2010 14:20, Reini Urban wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I have a working cygwin llvm and llvm-gcc, > >>>> but had no time to produce a proper package yet. > >>>> Attached are my cygport files and my local config. > >>>> No patches were needed. > >>>> > >>>> But I haven't bothered to build clang yet, > >>>> just the Clang llvmc plugin and llvm-gcc, > >>>> which I thought is harder to build and gives us more gcc > compatibility. > >>> > >>> Here's what I have so far for llvm/clang 2.6; the .cygport may be > >>> missing something, it's been a few weeks since I've looked at it. > >> > >> On the cygwin mailinglist we came to some required clang patches. > >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-01/msg00587.html > >> Sorry, untested, as I got unrelated linker errors. > > > > The change to tools/CIndex/CIndexer.cpp looks fine if it works. The > > change to tools/driver/driver.cpp isn't really right; the code really > > needs to be refactored. The changes to the non-C++ include paths in > > lib/Frontend/InitHeaderSearch.cpp look a bit suspicious, but it's okay > > anyway. The change to lib/Headers/stddef.h is completely wrong; what > > is it supposed to fix? > > Still don't understand why cygwin doesn't implement dladdr, it would avoid > some > ugly ifdef...
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple