On Nov 17 18:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 17 17:32, koerner.sebastian wrote: > > Hello Corinna, > > > > Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin > > returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as > > filesystem. The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type. > > > > Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest > > Cygwin 1.7.7 or the latest snapshot returns "vfat" and are they *really* > > netapps? In theory I'd expect that those are just remote FAT FS on some > > remote Windows machine, and they shouldn't be affected by the reported > > problem. > > > > > > I just checked and think I must have something mixed up. > > Under 1.7.7-1 both netapps are listed in "mount" as cifs and in getVolInfo > > as FAT with pretty much the same attribute set. > > Pretty much is not the same. Can you please send the getVolInfo output > for the other drive, too?
And, can you please check the next developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots and see if it fixes your problem? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple