I'm sorry. I should have learned by now not to post at the last minute before leaving for the day. I always make mistakes and leave out important information. Thanks for considering my problem in spite of these oversights. More below...
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 20 17:45, Brian Ford wrote: > > I'm just headed home from work right now, but I thought I would let you > > know of a regression from 1.7.9. It appears the effect of this patch: > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2004-q2/msg00124.html You were correct below that I cited the wrong patch. I simply swiped the wrong URL in a hurry; sorry. This is the correct reference: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2004-q2/msg00108.html > > is no longer working in the current snapshot. I'll try to narrow it down > > to which change caused the regression and send in an STC tomorrow. > > Is that the first Cygwin process started from a 64 bit process on 64 bit > XP or 2003? No; this is 32 bit XP Pro SP3. Most of the rest of this has been cleared up I think, so I'll save any further responses to later messages in the thread. Thanks again for your help. -- Brian Ford Staff Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple