Hi Corinna, On 23/12/11 11:18, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > On 23/12/11 02:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Dec 23 01:47, Shaddy Baddah wrote: >>> On 23/12/11 01:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> Other than that I might have a solution. I applied a patch which only >>>> adds the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_JOB flag if the calling process is member >>>> of a job and the job allows a breakaway. It works in my limited >>>> testing, but it would be important to know if it works for you, too, of >>>> course. If you're not set up to build your own Cygwin DLL, please test >>>> the next developer snapshot. >>> Yes, unfortunately I am not set up at the moment to build dlls, so >>> I'll eagerly await the next snapshot. >> Uploaded. > > Yes, this is working now. Thank you very much. > > I will still try and see if our desktop support will allow me to > disable the virus scanner for a short period to test if it made a > difference with that faltering dll. I'll report back in due course. OK, I worked with desktop support and tried the previous snapshot with the virus scanner disabled.
As I expected it didn't make a difference. There is still the possibility that there is some specific policy enforcement on my desktop at play here. But that is speculation. Thanks again, Shaddy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
