On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:54:23AM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >>"Christopher Faylor" wrote: >>> >>> In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they >>> think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something >>> please be assured that this will not happen. >> >>OK, what would cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something? > > There is nothing in what I wrote which would suggest that adding xinit as > a dependency was a possibility. >
I agree with Matt. If TK is requiring the use of the X server then the X server should be a package dependency of TK. It wasn't a dependency before because the X server wasn't needed but now the X server is needed to use TK. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple