On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:24:44PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >Il 02/05/2013 19.30, Andrey Repin ha scritto: >> Greetings, Angelo Graziosi! >> >>> win32gcc for Win32 with cygwin/gcc >> >> Cygwin gcc? Or mingw gcc? Or, ... ? >> In short, ... yeah, what Earnie Boyd said earlier. Just plain wrong. >> >> > >The "Supported Architectures" cited in [*] are "configure" options: > >$ PATH-TO/configure win32gcc [...] # for the Cygwin build > >$ PATH-TO/configure win32 [...] # for the Windows native build >(using VC++)
Do you see "linux64" and "linux64" a lot? No? It should just be "cygwin". cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple