On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:30:56AM -0700, Christian Weeks wrote: > >>On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:32:47PM -0700, Christian Weeks wrote: >>[..stuff..] >>So why aren't you trying the solution that was proposed for the problem? >> >>This is, what?, the third time today that someone has posted saying that >>they've noticed the discussion while missing the fact that the problem >>is supposed to be fixed in the latest snapshots. > >Thank you for your reply. > >I have tried the proposed solution at your request (I downloaded and >attempted each of the 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th snapshot fixes). The >attached trace file is the result (it appears to be the same under the 15th >and 16th snapshots- I did not bother generating for 13th & 14th). It is >still unfortunately not correctly functional. Instead of ramping my CPU >(now I only see very small spikes of 100%) it aborts the fetchmail daemon. >This is the log output from fetchmail: >fetchmail: starting fetchmail 6.1.2 daemon >fetchmail: couldn't find canonical DNS name of my.mail.server.com >fetchmail: Query status=11 (DNS) >fetchmail: sleeping at Tue Nov 19 00:10:16 2002 >fetchmail: terminated with signal 14 > >I expected it to enter it's sleep/wake cycle, but it doesn't appear to do >so.
I'd say this was actually a potential problem with fetchmail but this may be "fixed" in the latest snapshot. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/