On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:29:53PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote: >On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:17:11AM -0500, Steven Penny wrote: >>>Of course because of Cygwin flawless website... >>> >> If you want to experimentally figure out how many warnings you get, >> please go right ahead and continue with this style of communication. > >Really, I can do without veiled threats. If you are going to ban me or >whatever, >go ahead and do it. > >I have brought some constructive criticisms of this project with the hope of >starting a discussion around fixing/improving certain issues. Instead I am met >with brick wall attitude and threats of being pushed off the mailing list.
Your idea of "constructive" is apparently flawed. The comment that you cut (and I just put back) illustrates what I was talking about, as does your suggestion that I should contact Debian maintainers because I disagreed with the idea of maintaining a package file list. Your truculent insistence that I should knight you as the coreutils/bash maintainer is another example. >My suggestion has merit: Debian is no niche operating system and >"apt-get" is no niche package manager. You can make any suggestions you want. Just avoid the snide asides. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple