On 2017-10-18 00:45, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 18/10/2017 05:29, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/17/2017 7:49 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >> I'm only concerned with Cygwin at the moment. As I understand it the we >> should distribute x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe and not as >> x86[_64]-pc-cygwin-*.exe We also need to correct config.guess for the >> i*:CYGWIN*:* match. > it is irrelevant as x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe and > x86[_64]-pc-cygwin-*.exe are equivalent. > And usually it is not x86 but i686 > $ arch > i686 > For a regex pattern you should include both. > I do not care which one is built and distributed on my packages. > E.G. on octave > /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin > /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/x86_64-unknown-cygwin
Do gcc... and binutils have to match so the front end can find the build tools or are there config options for binutils triplet or vendor? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
