On 10/19/2017 2:37 PM, Steven Penny wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:47:29, cyg Simple wrote: >> > may we know which package ? >> > > If it refuses triplet has a strange way to use Autoconf/Automake >> > and changing the compiler seems the wrong way to solve the issue >> >> No, it doesn't matter. Delivering x86_64-pc-cygwin anything is wrong >> since the triplet is x86_64-unknown-cygwin. > > Wrong. It does matter. By failing to provide a package you are in > violation of > MCVE: > > http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve > > and deserve 0 help. If you want help, you need to give people enough so > that > they can help you. Otherwise Yaakov is right: > >> circular discussion of a nonexistent problem >
So you support the maintainers supplying an incorrect triplet? x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple