FYI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Chicares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "mingw-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] This -mno-cygwin question is on topic here
> Norman Vine wrote: > > > > Greg Chicares writes: > > > > > > [...] it has been proposed to use 'mno-cygwin' > > > in the wxWindows makefiles by default for all cygwin > > > and mingw builds (cygwin and mingw share the same > > > makefiles). > > > > As long as there is a 'standard' way of building a Cygwin > > version this sounds fine. > > > > ie > > ./configure --host=cygwin > > and > > ./configure --host=mingw32 > > > > should 'just do' the 'right thing' *automagically* > > I guess that depends on what you think the right thing is. > The person who submitted the patch says: > > | Default to using -mno-cygwin, it works best in mingw/cygwin/wine > | mkdir() takes only one argument in msvcrt, and 2 in all other cases > > It looks like you could override this with > make COMMON_FLAGS='' some-wxwindows-target > And it appears that this change has no effect on > './configure', but affects only building with the > canned makefiles. > > If you disagree with the change, here's what to do: > > | Patches item #667563, was opened at 2003-01-14 04:05 > | You can respond by visiting: > | https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=309863&aid=667563&group_id=9863 > > Further discussion ought to go there or a cygwin list. > I don't have a personal interest in cygwin, and I'm not > posting to their list because I'm not subscribed and > wouldn't see any responses--so that would be rude. But > if you're interested in wxWindows on cygwin, feel free > to quote this email anywhere else. > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/