-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:55:15PM -0800, Fish wrote: > > > >Is there any reason why Philip Aston's 6 Jul 2002 patch to > >gettimeofday et. al. logic to correct for WM_POWERBROADCAST events > >(PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND, PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC, > >PBT_APMRESUMECRITICAL) hasn't made it into the sources yet? > > > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00962.html > > > >Was this perhaps just a simple oversight? Or was there another > >reason for it not being applied? > > Perhaps it would be instructive if you read the whole thread. Perhaps I already did. Perhaps it doesn't explain what is meant by "sacrific[ing] accuracy for precision", nor precisely WHY "QueryPerformance* functions [is] bad news", nor cite the vague "various references" mentioned. AND PERHAPS you could just answer my question or perhaps point me to a different thread instead (that perhaps DOES have the answers I seek) instead of wasting my others' time with such unhelpful replies. Do you think perhaps that is possible? Or is that perhaps asking too much? - -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPiTLhkj11/TE7j4qEQLVBwCdFFe/nmRUBU9AcrAOtwI4oeH4pqsAoLdR qQYOSaG9Dra0JgJLC31AR12D =StPp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/