[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Right. Windows authetication is the main hinderance. > However, as the poster pointed out, if you're forced to > enter your password (by the lack of a .rhosts file for an > rsh session), then Windows password authentication > occurs and shares are available. But I guess I should > clarify the difference I see and the reason for my response. > While key authentication (via ssh) can't provide the password > protected share access, rsh access (with a .rhosts) should be > able to based on the posters description. That's the part > that I think could benefit from closer inspection. > > Sorry if I was a little vague initially (am I less so now? ;-) )
Umm? How is ssh key access different from rsh .rhosts access? They are both just a priviledged process deciding that a login is authorized hrough their own means, and telling Cygwin/Windows to let them in. Aren't they? Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
