On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 11:09, Lemures Lemniscati wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried to build exiv2 from the upstream repository [1] > with Adam's libinih package.
Thanks Lem for testing, I think this gives Adam the green light. Adam, indeed this is a very small library and I presume will not increase its overhead in the future. I guess it's up to you whether to split it into the runtime and -devel packages as usual... Thank you very much for volunteering to maintain this package! > Weirdly, this version [1] yields ./bin/cygexiv2-0.dll, > while the current version v0.27.5 [2] yields ./bin/cygexiv2-27.dll. > > I guess this change is not intended, but I don't know how to fix it. Yeah, it's a known issue on the main branch coming from this line of code: https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/blob/842ef05ee60bff765c0402a211971aed53b728cc/src/CMakeLists.txt#L168 and the fact that the main branch has an arbitrary version set to 1.0.0 for now... It shouldn't be related to anything discussed here though. Best regards, Milos -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
