Not only that, but this appears to go even further. By essentially "compiling" all these GNU utilities into one executable, there's a violation of the GPL to the extent that the code used to do that does not appear to be "Open Source". Double Whammy here.
And by the way - I AM a lawyer. (Member of the Michigan Bar Association in Good Standing). Brian Kelly "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 07/28/2003 07:26:26 AM Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire) Subject: GPL alert ? http://thinstall.com/unix_tools/ http://thinstall.com/unix_tools/ seems to have cygwin binaries w/out source. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>. "WellChoice, Inc." made the following annotations on 07/28/2003 07:55:01 AM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attention! This electronic message contains information that may be legally confidential and/or privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Release/Disclosure Statement
signature.asc
Description: Binary data
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
