Dave Korn wrote:
Since it is a known fact that it _does_ legitimately contain
self-modifying code, the fact that your system doesn't warn must mean it is
not configured to warn about self-modifying code.
---- This is probably a non-issue, but I don't know if it's been tested. Does anyone know if setup's self-modifying code feature could cause problems on XP-SP2 running on a processor that supports the No-execute bit on data segments?
Linda
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

