Nevermind! Sorry, folks - I really didn't mean to upset anybody! Bye then! H.
Brian Dessent wrote: > Jonathan Arnold wrote: > >> Hans Horn wrote: >>> Oops - didn't see this one! Just posted offer as bash voluteer >>> myself! >>> Was looking for bash 3.0 in the archives. >>> If Jonathan still wants to maintain bash 3.0, of course, I will >>> withdraw my offer. >> >> Yeah, sorry, I just haven't been able to get to it - crunch time >> here at work. If you want to give it a whirl, feel free, Hans. > > Just so everyone is clear here... The current bash maintainer is > Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, who was still around and answering bash > questions as of Feb: > <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-02/msg00263.html>. He has said > repeatedly that he has been busy and without access to a windows > machine, which is probably why there have been few bash updates. On > the other hand, he has also said nothing to indicate that he does not > wish to continue maintaining bash. Furthermore, threads in the past > have expressed the fact that 2.05b has been very stable and both > Ronald and others have agreed that any major changes in bash would > have to be done very carefully so as not to cause instability. > > I have CC:d this to the cygwin-apps list which is where discussion of > packaging should take place. > > Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/