On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:49:10PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:46:21AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >>>Or should I just build the kernel unstripped using cygwin-1.5.24-2-src, >>>and debug against that? >> >>Corinna has been responsible for the last few cygwin 1.5.2x releases and >>she has a different way of generating a release than mine. It's >>possible that the .dbg file isn't working right or created correctly. > >This seems to be the case. I finished a build of cygwin-1.5.24-2 (with >CFLAGS="-g -O0") but > > (1) the build process seems automatically to strip the dll, and >produce a detached .dbg file. > > (2) I got the similar behavior using my .dll/.dbg combo as I got with >the "official" pair from 1.5.24-2: popups -- but then insight died on >me. FWIW, my .dbg file is much smaller than the official one: 350k vs. >9.5M. > >Is it even possible anymore to create an "old-style" debugging >cygwin1.dll, with integrated rather than detached debug symbols?
No. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/