From: DePriest, Jason R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 7/13/07, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: > > "runas /netonly /user:machine2\userB" followed by "mkpasswd -d > > machine2 -u userB": fails > > > > If the server is stand alone, wouldn't mkpasswd -l be more > appropriate than mkpasswd -d?
That requires that I am able to run "mkpasswd" on the stand-alone server. Unfortunately, I don't have that option in this case. If "mkpasswd -l" allowed me to specify the name of another machine (something like "mkpasswd -l <machine> -u <user>"), then that might be a solution. -- Matt Seitz Manager, File System Virtualization Cisco Systems, Inc. .:|:.:|:. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/