Dave Korn wrote: >> Perhaps this can be "fixed" for any non-x86 Cygwin port? > > The very concept of a non-x86 Cygwin port is meaningless nonsense. You > need to do a bit more homework. I suggest you start by reading the first > sentence on the first page at http://cygwin.com/.
Doesn't Windows Server 2003 run on Intel's Itanium processor? Technically, that's a non-x86 Windows platform. -- Fran -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/