--- "Thrall, Bryan" ha scritto: > Andy Koppe wrote on Monday, January 19, 2009 9:22 > AM: > > >> Rerunning setup.exe, it showed me that I *did* > have util-linux > >> installed; even the most recent version. Is > "last" supposed to > >> be in /bin or in some other directory?
last is not in the current version of util-linux 2.13.1-2 but it was in the previous version 2.13.1-1 The right package is sysvinit 2.86-3 > > > > Hmm, same problem here actually. According to the > package search it > > should be there though. (Btw, searching for > 'last.exe' narrows down > > the list of hits.) > > > > Fri Jan 25 05:39:06 2008 8704 > usr/bin/last.exe > > > > Andy > > Interestingly, last.exe is also in sysvinit: > > thr...@pc1163-8413-xp ~/clouddev/visual > $ cygcheck -f /bin/last.exe > sysvinit-2.86-3 > thr...@pc1163-8413-xp ~/clouddev/visual > $ cygcheck -l util-linux | grep last > thr...@pc1163-8413-xp ~/clouddev/visual > $ cygcheck -l util-linux | less > thr...@pc1163-8413-xp ~/clouddev/visual > $ cygcheck -cd util-linux > Cygwin Package Information > Package Version > util-linux 2.13.1-2 > > And, as reported on http://www.cygwin.com/packages: > (sysvinit-2.86-3) > > Tue Apr 1 07:55:52 2008 12288 > usr/bin/last.exe > > Perhaps we have a conflict here? already solved I assume :-) > -- > Bryan Thrall Marco -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/