On 1/25/09, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > On 1/25/09, Paul McFerrin wrote: >> I don't like changes in "default" behavior of certain programs. Vim7.2 is >> one. > > Given that this post was entirely Vim specific, it would probably get > better attention on the vim mailing lists, as opposed to the Cygwin > list.
Except that the default behavior did not change in vim 7.2; the cygwin package must be different. The OP can note that starting vim as vim -u NONE launches vim without using any startup files, which means as close to vi-compatible as vim can get. ~Matt -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
