On Feb 3 12:06, Charles Wilson wrote: > I ran across an oddity in the cygwin headers today. > > <machine/_types.h> has > typedef signed int __int32_t; > unsigned int __uint32_t; > > <stdint.h> has > typedef long int32_t > typedef unsigned long uint32_t > > <cygwin/types.h> has > typedef __uint32_t u_int32_t; > > What this means is that these public types don't match (exactly) > > uint32_t == unsigned long > u_int32_t == __uint32_t == unsigned int > > Also, the public/private pair doesn't match (exactly) > int32_t == long > __int32_t == signed int
This has been fixed in the 1.7 headers in May 2008. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
