Marco Atzeri wrote:
> --- Sab 21/3/09, Peter Rosin ha scritto:
>>> Versions {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-3
>> for cygwin-1.7
>>> {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-4 for
>> cygwin-1.5
>>
>> Is it a good idea - longterm - to have lower numbers for
>> cygwin-1.7?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>
> in this case is just by accident, usually I made reverse.
> In any case it is only relevant that the two versions have a
> different number to avoid confusion between packages.
Given that the two are effectively in separate namespaces, and that 1.5 is
unlikely to receive many more updates (if ever), I imagine the scope for it to
cause trouble will be very limited.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
