> So what version of gcc is this NOT a problem for? Is the current > version available for download affected? It would be great if the > answer to this problem was simply, upgrade gcc to the latest!;-) No, it's too recent to be in any available version. CVS or patch your local copy; it's just two lines that need to be cut (minimum patch). The easier patch is to remove the -B option from configure; it should "just work" for most people. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s/2000... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Chris Faylor
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.... Chris Faylor
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs DJ Delorie
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs DJ Delorie
- Re: Cygwin SEGVs Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SE... DJ Delorie
- Re: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Earnie Boyd
- RE: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.... Andrej Borsenkow
- RE: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.1.5s... Earnie Boyd
- RE: [cgf: Re: rxvt SEGV (Win98, 1.... Andrej Borsenkow
